| John R. Woloshen
Owner
RATA Associates, LLC
1916 Boothe Circle
Longwood, FL 32750
Written Statement for the U.S. Senate Finance
Committee
Hearing on March 12, 2008
“Alternatives to the Current Federal Estate Tax System”
Chairman Baucus and Members of the Committee: I simply find
it hard to believe how short-sighted some policymakers and
interest groups are. The inheritance tax presented today as
an “alternative” to the current death tax will
affect no change in the tax burden experienced by small-businesses
such as my own.
Any form of death taxation will, without a doubt in my mind,
eat up my entire estate since I own a small but very successful
business. Regardless of whether the tax is applied to my children
or to me, the burden of the tax will fall on the business
and its 14 employees. When I die, my business will undoubtedly
have a tax bill greater than all of my other assets combined
based on the money it generates, even though it is so specialized
that it has a very low, possibly ‘zero’ market
value. My two grown children who have been running it and
making it grow for more than 10 years without my help will
not inherit anything and the business will go down the tubes,
putting both of them out of work along with 14 high-paid technical
employees.
My business, RATA Associates was founded in 1989 to provide
software support for compliance with certain federal housing
regulations. I believed in my ability to make this business
successful, and initially worked 70-80 hours a week to get
it going. My effort was rewarded, as the service turned out
to be a profitable niche market and provided substantial revenue,
most of which was reinvested in software improvements. However,
the same boutique specialty that makes the business successful
has also made it effectively worthless as market value is
concerned. My main “assets” are the minds of the
employees who understand the complexities of our software,
the regulations of the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, Fair
Lending, and Community Reinvestment Act, and the proprietary
services that we have developed to help banks and lending
institutions achieve compliance with these regulations. As
a result, the IRS most likely will value the business very
high based on past and expected future profits, but there
is not enough tangible assets or property which could be sold
to raise the cash needed.
An inheritance tax which taxes the individual bequests to
my son and daughter, rather than my estate, would still leave
my children in a bind. After taking a small exemption, perhaps
$2 million a piece, they would still be forced to pay over
half of the value of the business in taxes. This could easily
come to $10 to $20 million. The only way to pay this would
be to sell the business, or take out a loan that would make
running the business more of a chore than those two bright
individuals deserve. In fact, it is likely that the highest
loan I could take out would be $1 million, which would not
be enough to cover the likely death tax levy.
The federal government will possibly have a short term tax
windfall by taking everything I own and/or forcing the sale
of houses and office building at ‘fire sale’ prices
to make them sell quickly. However, in about 5 years time
or less, it will have taken in less than it would have if
the business were to keep running and growing, just from the
income taxes paid by my two children and the 14 (possibly
more by the time I pass away) employees.
My employees are some of the most intelligent, hard-working
and loyal individuals I have ever known. Many of them have
been with me from the start, and they have stuck with the
company through slow periods and rough patches. They do not
deserve to have their employment – and for that matter,
retirement – security, thrown into a tail-spin due to
a tax which neither I nor my children will be able to afford.
Honorable Senators, I am very frustrated. I am also somewhat
angry that this insidious tax is still with us when simple
‘COMMON SENSE’ says it should have been repealed
long ago. The IRS has already taken 30-40% of my business’s
earnings through the income tax. Is it too much to ask that
my children be allowed to keep running the business, preserving
my employees’ jobs and providing long-term income tax
revenue?
I realize that some people think that all businesses possess
the liquidity of Bill Gates or Warren Buffett, and therefore
face no serious burden with the death tax. Unfortunately,
this is not the case for me. I cannot set up foundations,
hire a legal team specifically for the purpose of rearranging
my assets, or otherwise take advantage of the many benefits
open to individuals such as Gates and Buffett. When I die,
absent a repeal or significant reduction of the existing death
tax, my children will definitely be forced to try to sell
the business.
Right now, it seems the prospects for positive legislation
are low. I fear we will go into 2010 with a ‘recipe
for murder’ in place, and come out in 2011 with what
we have now or worse. Members of the Senate Finance Committee,
I ask that you prevent this from happening by supporting legislation
to repeal the death tax or substantially reduce its rate.
This is the only appropriate “alternative” to
an unfair and destructive tax.
I’m sure that my situation is not unique. There are
tens of thousands of small businesses who face the same problem.
This tax is a nightmare for people like me who are trying
to live the American dream. Thank you for your time and for
your efforts to deal with this threat to my livelihood and
that of my family.
|